Update Schedule for k8s Cluster and its Applications

Update Schedule for k8s Cluster and its Applications

Regularly updating our k8s cluster, and the applications running on it, is one of the most powerful tools we have for ensuring our cluster functions securely and reliably. Staying vigilant about applying updates is particularly important for a fast moving project like Kubernetes, which releases new minor versions each quarter. This blog post outlines the process we’re proposing for ensuring our cluster, and the applications running on it, remain up to date. We believe its lightweight and manageable, requiring only a relatively small amount of work on a monthly cadence. We also believe it applies updates in a reasonable time frame.

Types of k8s updates

The Kubernetes project follows semver, meaning each version number maps to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH version. The semver spec dictates increasing the major number when you make incompatible API changes, increasing the minor number when you add functionality in a backwards compatible manner, and increasing the patch number when you make backwards compatible bug fixes. Patch updates are often issued to address security issues. For example, with version 1.13.4, the patch number was updated from 3 to 4 to reflect changes to address a CVE.

For the purposes of this blog post, we’ll concern ourselves only with MINOR and PATCH versions. As far as we know, Kubernetes has no concrete plans to increase the major release version anytime soon, and if they did, it would be a large enough disruption that we’d need a different plan for applying that update.

The Kubernetes project supports (i.e. blesses to run in production) the three most recent minor versions. We can watch that support in action by examining how the Kubernetes team would handle fixing a security vulnerability for all supported versions. As of 3/21/19, the most recent Kubernetes release is 1.13.4 and the most recent 1.12 and 1.11 releases are 1.12.6 and 1.11.8 respectively. Suppose Kubernetes discovered a security vulnerability necessitating a patch release. It would release 1.13.5. However, it would also backport the fixes to the previous two minor versions, necessitating a release of 1.12.7 and 1.11.9. Note, they would not do a patch release for 1.10.x, as it is not one of the three most recent minor versions.

If we want to receive security upgrades, which we certainly do, we need to ensure we are using one of the three latest minor versions of Kubernetes. Our cluster is currently running on 1.12.6, which means we are trailing one minor version behind the most recent Kubernetes release, and will continue to receive security updates.

Policy for Cluster Updates

via GIPHY

We propose the following policy for cluster updates. If there is a patch release to address a security vulnerability, we will apply it immediately. We are subscribed to the Kubernetes mailing list, and will rely on it for notifications. Otherwise, we will check at the start of each month for if there is a new patch release for our minor version, and will apply it if so. On a quarterly cadence, we will check if there is a new minor version release, and update if necessary to ensure we are using one of the three latest minor versions.

As a brief aside, because we use kops to manage our cluster, Kops support for different minor versions dictates which minor versions we can use. For example, we can not upgrade to Kubernetes 1.13 until Kops 1.13 is released. In practice, we don’t expect Kops to prevent us from ensuring our k8s minor version is one of the three supported minor versions.1

A brief note about application updates

In addition to ensuring our cluster is up to date, we also need to ensure the applications running on our cluster remain up to date. The release cadence and versioning scheme is relatively application dependent, so its difficult to dictate a specific policy. Instead, we propose a generic policy. Each quarter, we will survey all deployed applications, and ensure that the version we are using will be supported until at least the next quarter. If it is not, we apply the smallest upgrade necessary for our application to be supported until the next quarter.2 If an application does not define “supported”, then we define it ourselves as there are no known security issues, and if there was a security issue, we could update to address it without having to make breaking changes.

Conclusion

We hope these policies will help us, and you if you’re following along, regularly perform updates. By performing these updates, we’re practicing good software hygiene, and utilizing one of our most powerful tools for keeping our cluster, and the applications running on it, secure and reliable.

via GIPHY


1. While its not a problem if all we want to do is stay on a supported minor version, it is true that Kops lags behind Kubernetes. For example, while k8s is releasing 1.14, Kops is working to release 1.12. So if it is important to you to use the latest and greatest minor version, Kops may not be the best tool for you to manage your cluster.

2. We may also update an application if we want new functionality or to apply bug fixes, but will perform those updates on a more ad-hoc basis.

comments powered by Disqus